Page 52 - Jabalpur_EQ
P. 52

Brick Masonry & Reinforced Concrete Buildings
                  Chapter 3



                                                                           structures resisted the in-
                  The load  bearing  brick walls in unreinforced  masonry
                  plane  shear  imposed by  lateral loads  during  the earthquake.  The brick walls were
                  often weakened by the openings for doors and windows. The system of wall piers
                  and spandrels thus created was observed to fail in the shear, developing familiar
                  X or diagonal cracks. There were many out-of-plane failures due to the dynamic

                  instability  of slender walls.
                   The region also enjoys the popularity of mixed construction, which employs RC
                   floor slabs, cantilevers (balconies and porches), and a  few columns, while load
                   bearing masonry walls carry most of the gravity loads.  Damage statistics point
                   out the limited success of this type of construction for buildings taller than twvo
                   storeys.  However, when construction   practices  were sound and the  building  suf-
                   fered no major irregularities of any kind, this type of construction fared well for
                   most of the two storey houses.

                   The affected RC buildings were located within the town and, when properly con
                   structed, they exhibited superior behavior in comparison with non-engineered
                   structures.  Most  of  these  structures  were  undamaged  or  suffered  minor  non-
                   structural damage. However, such buildings close to the epicentral area suffered
                   extensive damage to the infill walls and/or partitions.  Infills  failed in in-plane
                   shear in addition to knocking out-of-plane due to lack of anchorage in  the sur-
                   rounding  frame. Failures in RC beams or columns were rare.

                   The type of construction that constitutes the majority of new building stock can
                   be best described as weak RC frame with solid brick infills The beam-column frame
                   is designed for gravity loads, or is expected to carry only such loads, and there-
                   fore,  are  weak in resisting  lateral  loads.  Moreover,  such  frames  may  not be
                   present in both directions of the structure. Often, RC portal frames are used to
                   support  the floor  over the  open bays  in one direction while load  bearing  brick
                   walis are used in the other direction. Unreinforced brick infills are used for exte-
                   rior and interior curtain walls and partitions. Very high in-plane shear stiffness
                   and a significant amount of shear strength before the masonry begins to crack are
                   characteristics of infill wall. Being a stiffer element in the load path, these walls
                   attract more seismic forces than the flexible and weak RC frames. Since masonry
                    walls are able to accommodate only small movements within the mortar joints,
                    they begin  to crack at  relatively  low seismic force levels. Severe  cracking  of infill
                    walls was observed and in some cases, the bricks shed off the frame posing a seri-
                    ous falling hazard.



                    DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE

                    It is difficult to establish precisely what caused the collapse or failure of most of
                    structures. In most cases, the collapse or failure occurred due to errors in the con-
                    ceptual design (i.e.  not conforming to sound earthquake-resistant design prac-
                    tice) and/or construction errors that are recognized and accounted for by many
                    building codes worldwide, including Indian Standard.. A description of damage




                                       Jabalpur Earthquake of May 22,  1997                      42
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57